A repeated deviation is a reason to investigate; its count alone gives neither a cause nor a decision.

Look for shared conditions

Fill date, run, time, location, vehicle, container and product fields consistently in each record.

Comparison steps

  1. State the deviation rule and time window.
  2. Count eligible runs with a deviation under that same rule.
  3. For each shared condition, divide deviations by eligible runs under that condition.
  4. Record denominators, missing files and measurement coverage with the result.
  5. Repeat the same comparison in the next period.

Threshold and pattern

Do not assume a universal repeat count; define the decision criterion in the site quality process and record any change.

A pattern guides investigation :: Denominators and record coverage show how comparable the repeats are.

A single record

Record a one-off finding too; if it recurs, match it to the earlier run using the same definitions and fields.

When a pattern appears. Separate an association from a possible explanation; if several processes changed at once, their effects cannot be distinguished.

Review by condition

Shared fieldRecords to check together
TimeLoading, stop and delivery times
Delivery pointRun order and waiting record
VehicleVehicle ID, route and eligible run count
ContainerContainer ID and matched measurement file
ProductProduct requirements and authorized quality assessment