Summarizing rejections by product group makes repeats visible; review delivery volume and reason together before interpreting a group difference as a cause.

Set the denominator and fields

Link each row to product group, run, container ID, rejection reason and measurement source. Divide each group's rejections by its total deliveries; raw counts can favor the most-shipped group.

Reason categories

  1. Transport record: measurements over time and run conditions.
  2. Pre-loading record: product measurement and time before dispatch.
  3. Acceptance measurement: method, point and device details.
  4. Earlier stage: supplier or production records.

Cross-check the records

A curve's shape alone does not identify the stage. Match loading, run and acceptance times on one timeline; note any measurement-method or clock differences. If unresolved, leave the source unknown.

Interpret group differences

Compare similar route, load and period conditions within a product group. If a difference remains, make the relevant record step an investigation candidate; separate limits or plate arrangements require technical specifications and authorized quality review.

When sharing a rejection table with other parties, show denominator, reason definition and measurement source. A rejection rate prioritizes investigation; it does not assign fault or responsibility by itself.

Rejection evidence and next check

Record findingVerify firstReview step
Pre-loading measurement existsProduct and time matchDispatch record
Change during runLogger and time basisRun/exposure record
Acceptance measurement differsMethod and deviceAcceptance procedure
No record foundArchive and downloadMissing-measurement reconciliation